Friday, December 11, 2015

Does Parental Involvement really matter for the success of a child

Have you ever asked yourself does my parental involvement truly make a difference in my child's life. For example, does it really matter if I attend hi/her play, basketball game, soccer game, etc. Well, the article below should shed some light on this question.

Why is Parental Involvement Important?
WHAT RESEARCH SAYS ABOUT PARENT INVOLVEMENT IN CHILDREN'S EDUCATION
In Relation to Academic Achievement
Where Children Spend Their Time:
  • School age children spend 70% of their waking hours (including weekends and holidays) outside of school
When Parents Should Get Involved:
  • The earlier in a child's educational process parent involvement begins, the more powerful the effects
  • The most effective forms of parent involvement are those which engage parents in working directly with their children on learning activities at home
Impact:
  • 86% of the general public believes that support from parents is the most important way to improve the schools
  • Lack of parental involvement is the biggest problem facing public schools
  • Decades of research show that when parents are involved students have:
  1.         Higher grades, test scores, and graduation rates
  2.         Better school attendance
  3.         Increased motivation, better self-esteem
  4.         Lower rates of suspension
  5.         Decreased use of drugs and alcohol
  6.         Fewer instances of violent behavior
  • Family participation in education was twice as predictive of students' academic success as family socioeconomic status. Some of the more intensive programs had effects that were 10 times greater than other factors
  • The more intensely parents are involved, the more beneficial the achievement effects
  • The more parents participate in schooling, in a sustained way, at every level -- in advocacy, decision-making and oversight roles, as fund-raisers and boosters, as volunteers and para-professionals, and as home teachers -- the better for student achievement
Parent Expectations and Student Achievement:
  • The most consistent predictors of children's academic achievement and social adjustment are parent expectations of the child's academic attainment and satisfaction with their child's education at school
  • Parents of high-achieving students set higher standards for their children's educational activities than parents of low-achieving students
Major Factors of Parent Involvement:
  • Three major factors of parental involvement in the education of their children:
  1. Parents' beliefs about what is important, necessary and permissible for them to do with and on behalf of their children
  2. The extent to which parents believe that they can have a positive influence on their children's education
  3. Parents' perceptions that their children and school want them to be involved
Type of Involvement:
  • Although most parents do not know how to help their children with their education, with guidance and support, they may become increasingly involved in home learning activities and find themselves with opportunities to teach, to be models for and to guide their children
  • When schools encourage children to practice reading at home with parents, the children make significant gains in reading achievement compared to those who only practice at school
  • Parents, who read to their children, have books available, take trips, guide TV watching, and provide stimulating experiences contribute to student achievement
  • Families whose children are doing well in school exhibit the following characteristics:
  1. Establish a daily family routine. Examples: Providing time and a quiet place to study, assigning responsibility for household chores, being firm about bedtime and having dinner together.
  2. Monitor out-of-school activities. Examples: Setting limits on TV watching, checking up on children when parents are not home, arranging for after-school activities and supervised care.
  3. Model the value of learning, self-discipline, and hard work. Examples: Communicating through questioning and conversation, demonstrating that achievement comes from working hard.
  4. Express high but realistic expectations for achievement. Examples: Setting goals and standards that are appropriate for children's age and maturity, recognizing and encouraging special talents, informing friends and family about successes.
  5. Encourage children's development/ progress in school. Examples: Maintaining a warm and supportive home, showing interest in children's progress at school, helping with homework, discussing the value of a good education and possible career options, staying in touch with teachers and school staff.
  6. Encourage reading, writing, and discussions among family members. Examples: Reading, listening to children read and talking about what is being read.
Student Interest:
  • Most students at all levels - elementary, middle, and high school - want their families to be more knowledgeable partners about schooling and are willing to take active roles in assisting communications between home and school
  • When parents come to school regularly, it reinforces the view in the child's mind that school and home are connected and that school is an integral part of the whole family's life
School and District Leadership:
  • The strongest and most consistent predictors of parent involvement at school and at home are the specific school programs and teacher practices that encourage parent involvement at school and guide parents in how to help their children at home
  • School initiated activities to help parents change the home environment can have a strong influence on children's school performance
  • Parents need specific information on how to help and what to do
Obstacles:
  • School activities to develop and maintain partnerships with families decline with each grade level, and drop dramatically at the transition to middle gra

Friday, October 16, 2015

What is the Proper Bedtime for a School-Age Child


What is the right bedtime for your school-aged child



As a parent you always try to what is best for your child. Sometimes, life takes over; extra-curricular activities, family dinners, homework, you name it . There just isn't enough time in the day! As an educator, we always see students so exhausted each day. So, in this blog I will post some strongly recommended times for all school-aged children to be in bed.

Children 3-6 Years Old: 10 - 12 hours per day
Children at this age typically go to bed between 7 and 9 p.m. and wake up around 6 and 8 a.m., just as they did when they were younger. At 3, most children are still napping, while at 5, most are not. Naps gradually become shorter as well. New sleep problems do not usually develop after 3 years of age.
7-12 Years Old: 10 - 11 hours per day
At these ages, with social, school, and family activities, bedtimes gradually become later and later, with most 12-years-olds going to bed at about 9 p.m. There is still a wide range of bedtimes, from 7:30 to 10 p.m., as well as total sleep times, from 9 to 12 hours, although the average is only about 9 hours.
12-18 Years Old: 8 - 9 hours per day
Sleep needs remain just as vital to health and well-being for teenagers as when they were younger. It turns out that many teenagers actually may need more sleep than in previous years. Now, however, for many teenagerssocial pressures conspire against getting the proper amount and quality of sleep.



WebMD Medical Reference


I need to work on this with my own child. She is in so many activities, homework demands, etc. She gets less than the recommended number of hours of sleep each night.

Thursday, September 24, 2015

What Impression are You Leaving on or For Our Future

Well, next week marks an adventure that will create memories for a lifetime for our 5th grade students. They will attend the Collin County Adventure Camp. There are several students that have never been camping in the woods. Although, we will be in cabins and not tents, we will still be in the woods. I have friends in their 30's who attended Plano ISD schools and they still remember their 5th grade camp adventure. I am so happy that we can provide this experience for all students. So, the question that I pose to all educators is??????  What impression are you leaving on your students; a lifetime of learning, life skills, how to create a complete sentence, how to divide or what? So........... as you read this blog please think about this question, whether you are an educator or not. What impression are you leaving on or for our youth of today, they are our FUTURE!

Friday, September 11, 2015

Off to a GR8 Start!

Well,

We have just ended week three of school. It has been very busy, getting to know new students, staff and norms. I love this time of year, it feels like a fresh start each year. It often reminds me how much I love the crazy and I wouldn't have it any other way. So, to all of my fellow educators, stay in the fight. We are in it to win and if we keep a positive attitude, remember why we got into this profession you will come in 1st place every time. I hope you all have an awesome school year. When times get tough think back to your love for the kids and building our future.

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

TechCamp for Adminstrators

Well today has been a very interesting day to say the least. Matt Arend's blog, presentation on the impact of social media in our world today was absolutely meaningful and interesting. As a teacher or an educator in general we sit through so many professional development sessions. Today allowed me to see the important impact social media plays on education and the entire being of all humans. I want to know how to do it, what it all means, how can it be effective for my parents; staff, students, and entire school community. Whatever, I can do to create a sense of belonging for all of my stakeholders, I am willing to learn. Thanks for an awesome year @Ryan Steele's blog, you have been a true trailblazer in this district and for the entire Christie Staff. I have learned so much working with you this year. I appreciate every moment that we have shared at Christie Elementary.

#signedalifelonglearner

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Summer Vacation

Good Morning,

As most teachers are on the beach, home with children, doing d.i.y. projects or perhaps reading a good book. Teaching is a wonderful thing in so many ways. You get to touch the lives of the future in such a fascinating manner; you can be innovative, you innovate students and yourself, but most of all you fulfill a passion that any good teacher has from deep inside to love your craft. So, as you are all on the summer vacations, don't forget to invigorate your souls, bodies and mind. Reflect on best practices that worked for your learners last year and what you could improve upon. Also, not all learners learn the same, so reflect upon diffrentiated instruction for all learners. Remember, we are all life-long learners in this vast growing world of technlogy the learning never stops. As my students all say H.A.G.S.

Friday, May 22, 2015

If I hadn't said this enough, I will say it again. I absolutely love what I do, I love working with children, teachers and people in general. I love helping others, making them feel successful, and learning each day with one another. I learn things from my students everyday. For example, yesterday was the big Engineering Expo Fair at my school. I enjoyed it so much, it was like a became a child again. I have never seen a group of students so smart and creative. I think Mark Cuban needs to cast some of my students on Shark Tank. I was so proud of my students and my teachers for pulling this event off. Thanks to all of the staff, parents, and students who made this event such a hit. I am proud of my students for being so innovative. I hope this allows them to see the sky is the limit and anything is possible. If you can dream it you can achieve. #notetoself Have a great Memorial Day Weekend,

Thursday, April 30, 2015

Standardized Testing on the Computer vs. Paper

Should state standardized test be taken on the computer or with a pencil and answer document? This is a question that is plaguing the minds of educators across the nation. Moving into the world of technology is becoming second nature to our children in American schools. However, I have found that there are sometimes glitches, wifi networks crashes, and a number of other complications that arise as students are testing. Not to speak of the economically disadvataged districts across America. Does this derail the thinking process of a student when testing? Remember no matter what flaws or problems students encounter while testing, a failed score will not be altered because of these problems. So, what do you think, should the test be taken on a computer or paper? The article that I post in this blog will support my opinion and beliefs that taking the test on the computer may not be the best idea, although we live in a world ruled by technology. Teacher: Why computerized standardized testing is ‘frightening’ By Valerie Strauss This was written by Melissa Bollow Tempel, who teaches first grade in the Milwaukee Public Schools. Tempel co-edited “Pencils Down: Rethinking High-Stakes Testing and Accountability” with Wayne Au. Her 1st- and 3rd-grade daughters have been opted out of standardized tests. This was first published on the Rethinking Schools website. By Melissa Bollow Tempel I walked away from the rest of my class and over to the three computers in the corner of my classroom. Two of my 1st graders, Jasmine and Jayden, sat at their computers with their headphones off, waiting for me to reset their computers to Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) test number 2. “I got 162,” said Jasmine. “You got 142.” “You did better than me,” replied Jayden with a frown. Shelly sat at the third computer. “I don’t wanna do the computer test,” she pleaded. “Do I have to?” In the past three years I have experienced unimaginable computer frustration. Don’t get me wrong: I treat my MacBook Pro like a third child, and I definitely use technology in the classroom to enhance teaching and learning. I’ve been accused of being in love with my iPhone, which serves as a timekeeper, meteorologist, and DJ in my classroom. And the opaque projector is an excellent, plastic transparency-free alternative to the overhead projector. Computers and technology have come such a long way in the past 20 years, and they hold a big place in the lives of this generation of students. Unfortunately, one use of technology is failing in my classroom: the rapidly increasing use of computers for testing. Computerized testing, including the widely used MAP test, has infiltrated the public schools in Milwaukee and across the nation like an uncontrollable outbreak of lice, bringing with it a frightening future for public education. High-stakes standardized tests can be scored almost immediately via the Internet, and testing companies can now easily link districts to their online data warehouses, which allows districts to quickly access test scores (which would be good if the tests were generating usable data). This system provides momentum to those who believe more tests should be given to “track progress” throughout the year. In my district this means that every classroom teacher tests students at the beginning, middle, and end of the year, administering four tests in math and reading each time. Limited funding and fewer staff in our district, as in most urban public schools, creates even more of a problem because there are not enough adults to serve as proctors. Setting up these tests is a tedious, time-consuming job involving a web of long, nonsensical passwords and codes. Teachers are being mandated to use many hours of valuable instructional time and limited teacher planning time to complete these tasks. In schools like mine that don’t have a computer lab, teachers have only a few computers in their classrooms. We are asked to simultaneously teach while setting up and administering a few tests at a time, seriously compromising the quality of instruction we are able to deliver. To illustrate the scenario, picture this: I have three computers on one side of the classroom, set apart from our learning area, so three children can take the test at one time. First I go to each computer and log in to the network using an assigned proctor name and password. Then I log in to the test application using a different random alphanumeric name and nine-digit password. Once in, I select the test the child needs to take, select the student’s name, then sit the child down at the computer to begin, making sure he or she has the headphones on properly. (Yes, one of my students took the test wearing the headphones attached to her neighbor’s computer. If I’m not watching carefully, others have taken the whole test without headphones on at all!) Then I hurry back to the rest of the class and continue teaching. When the child has a question, I have to go help. When the child is done taking the test, I have to go over and enter yet another proctor password to finish the test and start the process over for the next child. Part of the score is based on how long it takes a child to complete each question, so if the child has to use the bathroom I need to enter a code to pause the test. Each test takes about 20 minutes to complete; however, students do not finish at the same time, so I am going back and forth at three different times to enter the proctor password for the children and set up the next student. I’m doing all this while I attempt to teach a lesson, lead an activity, or help the rest of the class do their work. The alternative is to stop instruction altogether for a few days and give my students “busy work” while three students at a time take the tests. And have I mentioned that we have no art, music, or physical education teachers at our school, so I have no prep time? Unfortunately, the issue of time wasting and misuse does not even scratch the surface of the computerized testing chaos. Computerized testing now starts with students as young as 4 years old. MAP test data are reviewed and used in the screening process for children for special education. Those already receiving special education services with IEPs [Individual Education Programs] are required to take the grade-level test regardless of their instructional level . In Milwaukee, all students attending 4-year-old kindergarten are required to take the district’s computerized test beginning their second week of school—ever. One of the literacy tests is 53 multiple-choice questions long, and to finish it students must select an answer for every question. After each testing session teachers report that students end up in tears. Most 4-year-olds cannot sit long enough to finish the whole test and need to be redirected to their chairs many times. District administration allows the test to be given one-on-one to kindergartners; however, pulling from the ever-shrinking list of support staff means pulling the only available staff, the English language learner teacher and the librarian, to help. This test creates a domino effect on the entire school. Although our district’s administration believes these tests are given on a level playing field (because in this age of technology most children are supposedly exposed to computers at a young age), our primary students often come to school with little or no computer experience. In fact, many early childhood researchers believe that responsible parenting means little or no screen time for primary school children. As a result, young students click at random. One of my colleagues reported that she often witnesses students rubbing the mouse on their faces or on the computer screens. And this data is supposed to help guide our teaching? Widening the Gap The biggest injustice here is the technology gap that has a direct effect on the achievement gap. Students who have regular access to computers at home are clearly advantaged, from a testing standpoint, because they have a higher likelihood of being computer literate. Meanwhile, kids who don’t are being scored on both how to use the technology they have never had access to in addition to what is in the content of the test. This imbalance creates an assessment that is less valid or invalid because it measures something beyond what it is supposed to, and it penalizes students for something that they are not supposed to be tested on. At least two of my first graders, Jasmine and Jayden, have figured out how to click past the dog at the end of the test to see their score. Sadly, I cannot be in two places at once to prevent it, and as a result there is little doubt that these 6-year-olds are drawing conclusions about how “smart” they are based on deeply flawed tests. To complicate things further, the data from these computerized tests are used to determine which intervention classes students should be enrolled in — or in many cases, which classes they are forced to attend in place of engaging elective courses. This widens the achievement gap and perpetuates the racial and socioeconomic disparity between haves and have-nots. Our district’s new plan to help students is heavily based on the MAP test results. In fact, at one inservice, the students with the lowest test scores were already entered into my account as my intervention group. My professional opinion had been replaced by the test scores. I was surprised to see Julia, one of my smartest, highest readers in the group (I suspect she got bored with the test and decided to click randomly). When I said that Julia was not in need of any extra help I was strongly advised by our school’s literacy coach (assigned to our school one day a week) not to remove her from the group because, based on her test scores, Julia needed interventions. Of course, I moved her anyway. This form of testing has not replaced other tests. Quite the opposite: It’s given us the ability to give more tests. Milwaukee Public Schools has mandated that those scoring in the bottom 20 percent on the MAP test be given a biweekly Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) test to track their progress. The new age of computerized high-stakes standardized testing is a frightening use of our advancing technology, but we can resist. Many parents see through the rhetoric and are choosing to opt their children out of standardized tests altogether, and a movement is brewing. Yong Zhao from the University of Oregon reports that a 6 percent opt-out rate is enough to invalidate standardized test results. However, that many opt-outs would also mean a school would not meet federal mandates for adequate yearly progress. Many involved in the opt-out movement feel that it’s worth potential negative repercussions. As educators and parents, we need to be honest about how computerized testing serves to emphasize economic disparities. We can speak out about how it takes away valuable instructional time and returns little helpful information. We need to push district administrations to reevaluate the quality and usefulness of all computerized testing and demand other, more meaningful, forms of assessment. And we can urge our unions to support teachers and parents who challenge the inappropriate use of tests. Unless we stand together, erroneous computer data and educational officials detached from the realities of teaching will continue to determine our students’ futures.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

National Administrative Week

When a person walks into your school or company, who is the first face that they see? Perhaps, one might say it's the principal or director, because they are in charge of the campus/company. However, as we all know the principal or assistant principal are in classrooms, meetings, or in their offices. The first face that you see is your schoolis the secretary, clerks, or whatever your district calls them. It is important to place the right perosn in that position, they are the first impression of your school or company. With this week being recognized as Administrative Professional's Week : April 19-25, 2015; April 24-30, 2016; April 23-29, 2017, be sure to shower your front line with love. We could not do our jobs without their support. Below is a little history about how this week started. Enjoy! National Professional Secretaries Week and National Secretary's Day was created in 1952 through the work of Harry F. Klemfuss of Young and Rubicam. Klemfuss recognized the importance and value of the position to a company or business. His goal was to encourage more women to become secretaries. Using his skill and experience in public relations, Klemfuss, promoted the values and importance of the job of secretaries. In doing so, he also created the holiday in recognition of the importance of secretaries. The name of this special day has changed and evolved over the past few decades. But, the importance of recognizing these vital individuals remains. The two new terms in use today are: "Administrative Professionals" and "Executive Admins". The two names sometimes mean different roles and responsibilities in different companies and organizations. Both are broader terms, that encompass more positions than the original "Secretary" role. The name change recognizes and acknowledges that the role has changed significantly since 1952, and for the better at that. In Harry Klemfuss' day, these positions were the realm of women. Today, you find males in these positions. The most common ways of recognizing your Administrative Professional(s) today are: Flowers Cards, often with shopping gift certificates Take them to lunch Candies Assorted Gift Baskets Thanks, An Appreciative Assitant Principal

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Does Bad Behavior Truly Affect Academic Success

Press Release 07-175 
Children's Bad Behavior Gives Insights to Academic Achievement and Later Career Success
Early behavior problems don't impede children's school achievement, but persistent problems may impede educational and occupational outcomes.
Angry child
Early childhood behavior problems may not predict learning ability, but may predict career success.
Credit and Larger Version
November 26, 2007
New research suggests that children entering school with behavior problems, as a rule, can keep pace with classroom learning, but persistent behavior problems can be a strong indicator of how well these students adapt to the work world.
Two studies entirely funded by the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Developmental and Learning Sciences program uncovered these results. Researchers working through the Center for the Analyses of Pathways from Childhood to Adulthood (CAPCA) at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., conducted both studies.
The findings may help parents, teachers and social and behavioral scientists improve educational and occupational outcomes for disruptive students.
"Every student deserves a good education and an opportunity to have a fulfilling work life," said NSF Developmental and Learning Sciences Program Director Amy Sussman. "These findings can help us understand how to make that goal a reality for even the most difficult-to-reach students."
One study examined data from six large-scale studies of almost 36,000 preschoolers in which the same subjects were observed repeatedly over time. The research included two national studies of U.S. children, two multi-site studies of U.S. children, one study of children from Great Britain and one study of children from Canada.
Using various statistical methods to synthesize research results, Greg Duncan, human development and social policy professor at Northwestern University, along with the study's 11 co-authors, found that, surprisingly, difficulty getting along with classmates, aggressive or disruptive behaviors, and sad or withdrawn behaviors in kindergarten did not detract from academic achievement in childhood and early adolescence.
The study's researchers examined several indicators, including picking fights, interrupting the teacher and defying instructions. They found that kindergartners who did these things performed surprisingly well in reading and math when they reached the fifth grade, keeping pace with well-behaved children of the same abilities.
Although Duncan's study found no predictive power in early behavior problems for later learning, another CAPCA study, which examined older children, found such a connection. According to CAPCA investigator Rowell Huesmann, persistent behavior problems in eight-year-olds are a powerful predictor of educational attainment and of how well people will do in middle age.
If behavior problems of the kind seen in younger children continue until age eight, they can create other challenges, said Huesmann. He noted that while a small group of children fall into this category, their behavior has the potential to lead them to lower occupational and academic achievement than that of their better behaved counterparts.
Huesmann based his conclusion on a prior research study and a recent analysis by CAPCA researchers Eric Dubow, Paul Boxer, Lea Pulkkinen and Katja Kokko. That team studied two longitudinal data sets from the United States and Finland.
Analysis of data from 856 U.S. children and 369 Finnish children showed that children who engaged in more frequent aggressive behaviors as eight-year-olds had significantly lower educational success by their 30s and significantly lower status occupations by their mid-40s. The results were published in Developmental Psychology.
"It makes perfectly good sense that persistent behavior problems would have a substantial impact on later success," said Sussman. "When interviewing for jobs and progressing through one's career trajectory, personality and other characteristics that are not measured by tests certainly come into play."
There's a good chance that personality traits also come into play in the classroom. Huesmann and his colleagues hypothesize that children with persistent behavior problems lasting into the third grade are those who cannot be easily socialized to behave well and who therefore are more likely to experience a "hostile learning environment."
They speculate that teachers and peers likely "punish" these children, reducing or eliminating positive support for learning. But researchers note that if a child's aggression is short-lived, it is unlikely to have the same long-term consequences.
"Socialization of disruptive preschoolers by teachers and peers may ensure that a child's behavioral problems do not affect his or her educational achievement," Huesmann said. "Attending class, spending time with classmates, observing the rewards of proper behavior, and being told, 'No,' to correct disruptive behavior can benefit unruly children."
Researchers also noted that popularity and positive social behavior in childhood and adolescence predicted higher levels of educational attainment in early adulthood. They said it is possible that children with stable positive social skills experience a supportive and conducive learning environment.
Duncan's study of kindergartners did not address what types of preschool curricula might be most effective in reducing aggression or promoting school readiness. But researchers pointed out that play-based activities, as opposed to "drill- and practice-based" activities, foster academic and attention skills in ways that are engaging and fun.
-NSF-
Media ContactsBobbie Mixon, NSF, (703) 292-8485, bmixon@nsf.gov
Program ContactsAmy Sussman, NSF, (703) 292-7307, asussman@nsf.gov
Principal InvestigatorsGreg Duncan, Northwestern University, (847) 467-1503, greg-duncan@northwestern.edu
L Rowell Huesmann, University of Michigan, (734) 764-8385, huesmann@umich.edu
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering. In fiscal year (FY) 2014, its budget is $7.2 billion. NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to nearly 2,000 colleges, universities and other institutions. Each year, NSF receives about 50,000 competitive requests for funding, and makes about 11,500 new funding awards. NSF also awards about $593 million in professional and service contracts yearly.
Useful NSF Web Sites:
NSF Home Page: http://www.nsf.gov
NSF News: http://www.nsf.gov/news/
For the News Media: http://www.nsf.gov/news/newsroom.jsp
Science and Engineering Statistics: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
Awards Searches: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/